create your own visited states map
or check out these Google Hacks.
I’ve driven across the US over 16 times so, I’m not talking about landing in the Detroit airport before returning home. Note: Michigan isn’t marked as visited.
cultural practitioner / thoughts & essays
create your own visited states map
or check out these Google Hacks.
I’ve driven across the US over 16 times so, I’m not talking about landing in the Detroit airport before returning home. Note: Michigan isn’t marked as visited.
“I have a certain sympathy with Mr. Mazel,” says Roger Kimball on OpinionJournal – Leisure & Arts. “I believe works like ‘Snow White’ are art largely by dint of definitional courtesy. Really, they are examples of propaganda masquerading as art. They poach on the prestige of art in order to have it both ways. Criticize the aesthetic vapidness and you get a lecture about how the artwork transcends the traditional artistic categories to interrogate the oppressive political structures of the status quo, blah, blah, blah. Criticize the moronic politics and you get a sermon about not reducing works of art to a simplistic set of objective declarations.” Mr. Kimball is managing editor of The New Criterion.
Yahoo! News – Sweden and Israel in furious diplomatic row over art scandal: “The artwork was designed by Israeli-born Dror Feiler and his Swedish wife Gunilla Skoeld Feiler, both of whom denied the work was a ‘glorification’ of the suicide bomber. Swedish press reports said Israel has threatened to withdraw from the “Stockholm International Forum — Preventing Genocide” conference, which is to take place January 26-28 with representatives from 60 countries in attendance.”
“The dispute erupted Friday after Israel’s ambassador to Sweden, Zvi Mazel, was thrown out of Stockholm’s Museum of National Antiquities for vandalising an art work showing the photo of the suicide bomber who killed 21 Israelis at a restaurant in northern Israel in October. The ambassador was caught on videotape tearing down one of the spotlights and throwing it into the water, causing the installation to short-circuit. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on Sunday backed Mazel’s actions. Mazel has defended his actions, saying: ‘This is not art, this is a monstrous glorification of suicide bombers and an incitement to genocide against the Israeli people.'” [The artwork as shown is a sailboat in a pool of “blood” with the female bomber’s face on the sail.]
This is disturbing. What did Mazel do, go find a ladder, disconnect a light fixture and toss it? Do they have no guards? Of course, those with diplomatic immunity seem to get away with things others are not able to. I remember the former N. Miami Chief of Police walking through MoCA at its inaugural telling me, a museum staff employee and chief of museum security, that he could touch whatever art he wanted because he had a “piece” on his hip.
Anyway, what happened with going to the museum curator and finding out about the work? It seems obvious that an international museum hosting an exhibition in conjunction with an international conference on the same subject would be some kind of clue. What happened to speaking with director and requesting its removal, if the work was so personally offensive? But then, I’m not a Zionist.
[added material: 23hr00] There was a video accompanying this article that I was not able to see until much later in the evening (after I got off work where I originally posted this). The diplomat calmly, yet internally seething, walked up to the outdoor installed work, turned off the two lights and we hear sounds of one of the light stands being knocked over. He was then escorted out of the museum during which time there was dialogue in both Swedish and English in bitter tones.
I was able to see the work well enough in the video to see in reality, it was rather a weak piece visually. I looked like a student work: exploration of an idea with poor materials, setup quickly with whatever is immediately available, and left for viewing. However, the artists are standing behind the work in the above image.
Anyone who has a problem with artwork on exhibition should speak to those in charge and not take things into their own hands. Even though this work was not greatly damaged, because of its poor materials, there are ways to handle complaints other than the angry and violent way this diplomat did.
Most of the work in this fair was conservative, blue-chip, or established. One gallery, Kashya Hildebrand, provided something more edgy and exciting for a change. At Art Miami they provided one of the most hideous paintings at the fair, a work by one of their European artists. [+] The work I really liked by a Russian photographer, I was told, developed in an eastern coal mining region. With the fall of the Soviet economy miners that were not working became the willing models and preformers for a project that was largely a protest performance piece. [the letters reflected on the glass were from work mounted opposite the photos] Needless to say the men (I don’t recall seeing any women) were gritty and very raw. It was confrontational with a sexual edge. This work did not look like it was necessarily marketed toward a queer audience though. Sobe would have been a much better place to show these photographs but, instead, they had the big ugly paintings on their outside walls. If they had some of these photos at Art Miami I wouldn’t know; I avoided their booth like the plague. [click image to see larger view]
One bad thing about having two art fairs so close together in both time and proximity is that attending both raised issues for the lectures they both offered. Art Miami had one on Collecting Photography that I felt would have been the lecture of choice for Saturday. However, Saturday was my only day to attend Palm Beach Contemporary. The lecture in PB was another on Globalization. Blah. Maybe it would be better than I expect. Anyway, I’m jumping ahead of myself. full text
ArtsJournal: Modern Art Notes has Miami Art Exchange listed on this month’s Blogroll. I’m honored, thank you. I hope we can meet next time you’re in the Miami/ Ft. Lauderdale area.
Only because I had an appointment to have my eyes checked did I return to Art Miami on Friday. It was mostly to talk a bit more with some friends and with a few dealers in a more relaxed atmosphere, since the crowds were at a minimum. It was a good idea. I did see Dr. Mercy Quiroga, Dept. Chair of Visual Arts and Philosophy of Miami-Dade College, and exchanged a few words of greetings and catching up. I worked as an Adjunct Professor there in the past. Anyway, I don’t think I missed any art at the fair. These are the final two works I wanted to mention before heading up to Palm Beach Contemporary later today. I had a bit more time to write for Art Miami than for Art Basel Miami Beach. No final papers to grade, nor final exams to administer. Here’s the complete reports: Miami Art Exchange Art Blog
Art Miami opened with it’s widely attended preview tonight. The fair was smaller than the recently held Art Basel Miami Beach, and more focused on Latin American artists. As usual, I saw lots of friends and took note of some interesting works. Again, quality photography was in evidence. Most of this work was by the masters, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Edward Weston, Ansel Adams, and Leo Matiz. Matiz is being shown at the new local gallery in the Miami Design District, Chelsea Galleria. This body of work focuses on Frida Kahlo and other images from Mexico. I thought the work was really exciting to see, not just because of its historical value but because of the quality of the prints and the warmth of the image making. My favorite was a pair of man’s hands gently holding a tiny sapling for a reforestation project. Powerful hands, gentle and sensitively expressed.
Right next door to their Art Miami space was someone I need to contact, 21st Publishers of Fine Art Photography (Rochester, NY). Their books are hand-printed with a variety of processes: photogravure, tritone plate, and platinum prints are some. These books are awesome.
Further updates over the next few days…
Web users entering the words “miserable failure” into the popular search engine are directed to the biography of the president on the White House website. (I can’t believe I’d put that face on my blog!)
I am The Chariot The Chariot often appears when hard control is or could be in evidence. At its best, hard control is not brutal, but firm and direct. It is backed up by a strong will and great confidence. The Chariot can mean self-control or control of the environment. This card also represents victory. There are many types of wins; the Chariot’s is of the win-lose type. Your success comes from beating the competition to become number one. Such moments are glorious in the right circumstances. For a full description of your card and other goodies, please visit LearnTarot.com |
What tarot card are you? Enter your birthdate. |
I don’t know much about tarot but, as in astrology, do the cards meaning change as time passes or are they fixed in meaning?